Trustible — Comply

Comply

AI regulatory compliance

Compliance isn't a document. It's evidence you have to produce on demand.

Most organizations are subject to multiple AI frameworks at once — the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 — each with distinct obligations and overlapping requirements they have no unified way to satisfy. Trustible maps your governance controls across every applicable framework at once, so you document your program once and produce evidence the moment an auditor asks.

Continuous AI governance lifecycle

Intake

Manage Risk

Monitor

Comply

The problem

Compliance falls apart when it's spread across three processes

Multiple frameworks, overlapping obligations, and no unified way to satisfy them — so audit becomes a documentation project instead of an export.

Three frameworks, three processes, three repositories, no view of the gaps

EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001 each managed separately, with no unified picture of where you stand.

You can't tell a regulator which systems are high-risk under the EU AI Act

Or whether the Annex IV technical documentation is complete for any of them.

You're retrofitting compliance after the fact

Governance happened informally; now you're reconstructing evidence for frameworks you never deliberately mapped to.

You run separate assessments for every framework

Duplicated effort, version-control problems, and documentation that doesn't hold together under scrutiny.

Your AI policies live in isolation from the systems they govern

Nothing connects the policy to the intake review, the risk assessment, or the approval decision.

The board asks about compliance posture; your answer is a spreadsheet count

A manual tally of rows, and a significant amount of uncertainty.

How it works

Here's how Trustible closes the gap.

Four capabilities turn governance activity into compliance evidence — mapped across every framework at once, assembled as you work, and ready the moment an auditor asks.

01 — Multi-framework regulatory mapping

Document once. Comply across every framework at once.

Trustible maintains expert-curated control mappings across 10+ frameworks simultaneously — EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, Colorado SB 205, and more — so every governance action your team takes contributes to compliance evidence across every applicable framework at once, without parallel documentation runs.

Expert-curated mappings across 10+ frameworks
One governance action → evidence for every enabled framework
No parallel documentation runs to maintain

A single intake submission generates mapped compliance evidence across every framework your organization has enabled.

Explore framework mapping

Mapping — Risk assessment: Resume screening AI

This action maps to

EU AI Act — Art. 9, Annex IVMapped

NIST AI RMF — MAP 1.1, MEASURE 2.3Mapped

ISO 42001 — Annex A.6.1Mapped

Colorado SB 205 — §6-1-1703Mapped

02 — Audit-ready evidence packages

Evidence assembled from real governance activity — not reconstructed.

Every governance action in Trustible — intake decisions, risk and impact assessments, approval records, periodic reviews, policy sign-offs — is logged with field-level precision and timestamped to the use case record. When an auditor or regulator asks for evidence, it's already assembled.

Field-level logging of every governance action
Timestamped and linked to the use case record
Exportable audit packages in PDF and Excel

Organizations cut regulatory documentation time from 12 hours to 2, with exportable packages available on demand.

See evidence packages

Evidence package — EU AI Act audit

Intake & classification records14 docs

Risk & impact assessments9 docs

Approval decision logcomplete

Periodic review historycomplete

Policy sign-offscomplete

Export PDF Export Excel

03 — AI-powered control gap analysis

Per-article gap analysis, recalculated as your program changes.

Trustible evaluates your internal AI policies against specific framework articles — EU AI Act clauses, ISO 42001 Annex A controls, NIST AI RMF subcategories — and surfaces which requirements are covered, which are partial, and where gaps remain. Framework readiness scores update automatically as governance activity progresses.

Evaluated against specific articles, clauses, and controls
Covered, partial, and gap status for every requirement
Readiness scores recalculate as activity progresses

Per-article gap assessment across every enabled framework, continuously recalculated as documentation and controls change.

See gap analysis

Gap analysis — EU AI Act

Art. 9 — Risk management systemCovered

Art. 10 — Data governancePartial

Art. 11 — Technical documentationCovered

Art. 14 — Human oversightGap

Framework readiness87%

04 — Board & executive compliance reporting

Compliance posture your board can actually read.

Executive dashboards surface framework readiness percentages, control coverage by domain, risk distribution across the portfolio, and review status — in views designed for governance leaders, audit committees, and boards. Reports are exportable and built from the same governance activity that satisfies your auditors.

Readiness and coverage views for boards and committees
Risk distribution across the AI portfolio
Exportable, built from real governance activity

Real-time compliance posture across every enabled framework, filterable by department, risk level, and status.

See compliance reporting

Compliance posture — Q3 board view

EU AI Act

87% ready

NIST AI RMF

91% ready

ISO 42001

78% ready

Colorado SB 205

95% ready

Board-ready · exportable · filterable by department & risk

10+

frameworks mapped at once

12→2h

documentation time per audit

1-click

audit-ready evidence export

Built-in expertise

Regulatory expertise built into every mapping

AI regulation is not static. The EU AI Act's high-risk classification categories and Annex IV technical documentation requirements continue to be interpreted through EU AI Office guidance. ISO 42001 certification expectations are evolving as accreditation bodies gain experience with first-wave audits. NIST AI RMF is being adopted into federal procurement in ways that shift what alignment requires. Trustible's team of AI policy and legal experts tracks all of it, updating framework mappings and control libraries on an ongoing basis — so your program stays current without your compliance team monitoring regulatory developments independently.

That means when a new EU AI Act implementing act is published, or NIST releases AI RMF Playbook updates, your framework readiness scores and gap analysis reflect the current state of the regulation — not the state it was in when you first configured the platform.

What customers say

Three frameworks, one governance program

“We were facing EU AI Act obligations, ISO 42001 certification pressure, and an internal audit — all in the same quarter. Before Trustible, that would have meant three separate documentation projects. With Trustible, we ran our governance program once and produced the evidence packages for all three. The ISO auditors specifically noted how complete and traceable our documentation was.”

Chief Compliance Officer, Global Financial Services Firm